The thought
alone causes most people to frown their eyebrows and stare at me in utter
disbelief. Who says this?
His study, based
on the in-depth research published by such experts as professors Amélie Kuhrt, Maria Brosius, Jozef Wiesehöfer, Wouter Henkelman, and others is concentrated on the clay tablets found at Persepolis
(see: Fire
over Persepolis) and saved by the fire as mentioned in his chapter Biographical/Geographical
Notes:
“An unintended consequence of
these fires was the preservation of clay archive tablets, cooked and hardened. About
a hundred Treasury Archive texts from Persepolis,
recording royal payments in silver in 492-458 BC were made available between 1948
and 1965. Other texts, published in 1970, were written in Aramaic. This
coincided with the biggest windfall: the discovery of over 8,000 texts, dated
between 509 and 493 BC and found on tablets in the Persepolis Fortification Archive. They deal with the royal administration
of food commodities. About 7,000 are written in the Elamite language of Susa, with some
incrustations of Old Persian. Another thousand were written in Aramaic, but
there is also one in Greek, one in Frygian, and a few in Neo-Babylonian.”
He further underscores
how and where women are mentioned performing tasks we would expect were those
of men:
… “the archive tablets routinely
register travel rations of wine, beer and grain issued to royal women for extensive
journeys throughout the empire on their own behalf. And … to commoner women ...
For example, one tablet (… dated to 493 BC), registers a journey by a woman
employee from Susa, Mizapirzaka, who has to carry
a letter to Persepolis.
The text adds that she carries a personal seal (…) that authorizes her to claim
provisions at the waystations.”
Until recently, the ruling opinion was that the Greeks doubted how women “could obtain and exercise power in the Achaemenid monarchy. How could an empire be ‘well ruled’ if women were influential and even exercised power over the king himself?”…
.. “with the publication, around 1970, of numerous tablet texts from the Persepolis Fortification site … Dr Maria Brosius identifies a particular category of women officials who carry the title of Arashara. … specifically mentions four Arasharas by name: Dakma, Harbakka, Matmaba and Sadukka. Meat rations are rare, so the issuing of 4 complete sheep to each of these women supervisors confirms their important payment level. …
At least ten more tablets refer to the salary of Arasharas, showing that these highly qualified women were better paid than male personnel of lower professional rank. …
[Achaemenid, maybe Arashara statuette
from Bosschart's book]
750 measures of wine among 65 employees; three Arasharas receive 30 measures each, whereas a male scribe at the same workplace gets only 20. On another tablet we even see an Arashara being issued 50 measures. The sliding scale of payment in order of professional qualification (and not by gender distinction) … distributes wine rations: two men who are called ‘manual workers’ get 10 measures each; two other men who are “doorkeepers” by profession, get 20 measures each; and the Arashara is allotted 30 measures. The highest payment (in grain) of all the tablets in the archive also goes to an Arashara: 75 quarts per month…
… an exceptionally high number of Arasharas worked at the service of queen-mother Irdabama. The circa 7,000 archive texts that have been translated so far mention some 150 places in the region of Persepolis (and in a few cases, beyond) where royal ladies had storehouses or workshops. Usually the personnel working there was overseen by Arasharas.”
...
"The tablets show women in a wide range of occupations in Persepolis: woodworkers and stoneworkers, artisans, winemakers, furniture makers, treasury clerks, storekeepers, carriers, grain handlers. A tablet dated to 502 BC refers to ‘Indukka, mother of Tuku’, stating that she is “the chief of the merchants”. It registers the amount of tax she has paid -in silver- on “the business deal that she has managed”.
… “Irdabama regularly orders greater amounts of foodstuffs to be delivered at the palace from her own … storehouses … Irdabama has more personnel working at her various factories. On top, she can direct the royal treasury to make payments in silver” …
As Alexander traveled in the company of Queen-mother
Sisygambis from Issus
to Susa
the equality of royals and commoners must have become apparent. His close
company with Barsine
undoubtedly confirmed and enhanced the role of women. Dr. Maria Brosius further
writes:
“Persian queens were much more
than consorts, or than queen-mothers supposedly ruling a palace harem. They had a
huge influence in decisions about whom to promote, whom to punish, whom to
execute, or whose life to spare. Sisygambis, queen-mother of Darius III, also
wielded such power, even after her son had been replaced on the throne by Alexander
the Great. He pointedly upheld her status as the most prominent woman in the
empire, and treated her as if she were his own mother.”
There is little
doubt about the real meaning behind the mass-wedding in Susa
as arranged by Alexander in 324 BC
(see: Susa
with its unique glazed brick walls). Lacking time and knowledge, he
could not personally choose the brides-to-be for his Companions and close
friends but Sisygambis
could and did. The brides, many of them princesses in their own right, were
selected with care, and probably well-prepared by Sisygambis
for their new role as wife of one of Alexander’s
marshals. Their independence would inevitably trickle down to their children
and children’s children. What an ambitious vision!
Alexander always led by
example. His wedding with Stateira, the eldest daughter of King
Darius III, and Parysatis, the youngest
daughter of King Artaxerxes III was celebrated at the same time as that of 90 court members.
Each of the newlywed couples received a dowry from the king and on this happy
occasion, Alexander granted
a gratuity to his Macedonians who had taken Asian wives during his campaigns.
He paid out of his own pocket for the proper education of their children.
The Susa
celebration was Alexander’s first
step towards uniting West and East, not limited to Greece
and Persia
but encompassing the entire then-known world. He laid the basis for one single
world in which everybody was equal, East or West, man or woman. What we call
today an emancipated woman existed for 2,500 years, not as a dream but a
reality! So much time has been lost on the subject!
Alexander was a visionary, but
none of his generals or friends understood his vision. The one exception was Hephaistion, but he died shortly after
the wedding, poisoned no doubt. As a result, Alexander’s plans were muffled and erased from history.
When the king
died one year later, his world died with him. Had Alexander lived long enough, we would all speak Greek. What’s more,
for 2,500 years our world would have been one where men and women lived on the
same foot, with the same rights and the same status.